The key difference between carbon dating and uranium dating is that carbon dating uses radioactive isotopes of carbon, whereas uranium dating uses uranium , which is a radioactive chemical element. Carbon dating and uranium dating are two important methods of determining the age of different organic materials. We call them isotopic dating methods. The oldest method among them is Uranium-Lead dating method. Although it is a very risky method, if we do it very carefully, the results are highly accurate.
Almost everyone has heard on the news about archaeological findings claiming to have discovered a 12, years old bone, or a tomb with a skeleton of an individual who died 18, years ago. Do you remember when they found the famous tomb of Tutankhamun in Egypt? We have certainly been to a Natural History museum and saw exhibits of dinosaur or mammoth skeletons weather they are real or replicas. We might have seen displays of how our pre-historic ancestors looked like, and every display would indicate in the information box the date they were alive. But have you ever wonder how scientists can tell how old they are?
We know that carbon 14 dating is totally irrelevant to the theory of evolution. Ignorant evolutionists, however, think carbon 14 dating proves evolution, and continue to make that claim. Comedian Lewis Black, who by no stretch of the imagination is a knowledgeable evolutionist, argues,. We have the facts in carbon dating and fossils. Perhaps we should not even dignify this with a response, but we do get emails from evolutionists asserting that carbon dating proves evolution.
Geologists often need to know the age of material that they find. They use absolute dating methods, sometimes called numerical dating, to give rocks an actual date, or date range, in number of years. This is different to relative dating, which only puts geological events in time order. Most absolute dates for rocks are obtained with radiometric methods.